Fix iteration of OpenAL src.bufQueue #23916
Conversation
|
I skimmed that PR and it looks like this is the only case where .length wasn't deleted from the iterated sequence during the conversion to for..of. |
|
I wonder---doesn't AudioContext stuff require a click? I don't know how it acts or what it does in the absence of interaction. |
|
I've copied one or two tests and given a "fast" version of the test_openal_buffers to avoid having to cycle through the whole entertainer.wav in automated tests. |
test/test_browser.py
Outdated
| }) | ||
| def test_openal_playback(self, args): | ||
| shutil.copy(test_file('sounds/audio.wav'), '.') | ||
| self.btest('openal/test_openal_playback.c', '1', emcc_args=['-O2', '--preload-file', 'audio.wav'] + args) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why can't use use best_exit here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm sure we could! I just copied this from test_other.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, this test doesn't seem to work in browser under pthreads (the sound clip finishes but the test never terminates), but that's not really related to this PR. Any ideas on why that might be happening? Does the thread need to do some sleeps or something?
In the meantime I have removed the pthread parameterization of this test on test_browser.py.
|
The rebaseline on this branch was a mistake, do you want me to undo it? |
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
| 232600 | |||
| 232604 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This rebase just landed separately: #23918
JoeOsborn
force-pushed
the
fix-openal-iteration
branch
from
669dfaf to
2fb2d90
Compare
|
The test failure is that emscripten_async_call needs to cast an ALuint to a void *, but void * is bigger than ALuint on 64-bit. Should I copy it into a intptr_t first and then cast to void *? |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
JoeOsborn
force-pushed
the
fix-openal-iteration
branch
2 times, most recently
from
975ae94 to
8c23ffc
Compare
JoeOsborn
force-pushed
the
fix-openal-iteration
branch
from
8c23ffc to
7de129f
Compare
This failing test shows up under the interactive tests only, so I guess CI didn't catch it. Caused by #23867 .